Currently, I recommend selecting colonists from people who are professional speakers, preferably but not limited to YouTube, television, radio, actors and teachers. Specifically, I would recommend starting from two categories:
1. Professional broadcasters with native American English and English, who worked on Radio Liberty, and International service of BBC preferably in 1980s. This was the time when these services were most vibrant. Nowadays they lost much in their importance and the spirit there has somewhat decayed. You want people who had really great experiences in the past and were not affected much by decay.
Please check out the movie "Morning Glory". It shows an example of an ideal broadcaster.
People like Walter Cronkite would be best.
Take into account that people working in Radio Liberty and similar counterpropaganda were always exposed to culture of spies and were involved in it one way or another. It is always somewhat damaging to person's integrity. Still I would consider these as best candidates. They would have much experience; some of them would be able to think globally.
2. Youtube broadcasters which have popular channels.
Ideal quality would be for a person to have experience and be active in alternative thought broadcasting involving ideas of lightworkers, contact, New Age and such. These people are often compromised and have many damaging experiences, but they would be most prepared for your realities.
When I say compromised, I mean that these people might have already faced the need to comply to MIC orders and to restrict their topics of broadcasting. This would relate to workers of C2C. They are great broadcasters but they lost come of their credibility since they seem to be controlled and compromising in quality and essence of what they say. Some of top figures among these have not very trustworthy appearance: Alex Jones, David Wilcock, Alfred Webre, Steven Greer and Dan Winter. All 5 of them are great thinkers, but so damaged by persecution by establishment that it is imprinted in their way of talking. People see this insincerity in their presentation, and this insincerity comes mainly from hiding the fear, the damage and much deeper knowledge. Professional broadcasters are more adept in hiding their fears and hiding the fact that they know much more than they tell, or at least presenting this fact in more trustworthy way.
People like David Icke and Shirley MacLaine have much more trustworthy appearance.
I will repeat, that many scientists maybe not too good for the tasks of developing new culture and conveying it to people. They are too brainwashed by establishment, their speech is too boring, their thinking is often too remote, in their work, and they are subjected to too many necessary compromises. Of course, there are good exceptions, there are great speakers among scientists, some are great thinkers and teachers, but still, the amount of brainwashing and compromises in science may be too damaging. It all depends how good you are in picking the subjects. For example many great successful scientists are great leaders but would be terrible in team work because they are used to go their own way and to build their own teams. They could be great leaders but would be unable to work under supervision of others. My estimate is that you may want to start building your team from people known to be good team workers.
~~~
Chapter 15
COMPETITION
MIC = military-industrial complex