Max Rempel, Ph.D.

191. Hatred (part 1 Of 4)

Hatred is a negative emotion associated with certain piece of knowledge. Typical is to hate certain people, groups of people, situations, things and processes. Hatred is pretty universal. Even enlightened people often hate some things. The way enlightened people treat hatred is that they convert the emotion of hate into emotion of peace coupled with mental rejection by choice. So the emotion is converted from a negative one to a positive one and it is helped by conversion of emotional negativity to a mental decision. This is very healing.

Here is an example of hatred. For example, Russian antisemites hate Jews. (The term antisemites is absurd since antisemites hate Jews but provide support of other Semites by supplying them weapons and finances to terrorize Jews). Antisemites blame all their troubles and troubles of their countries on Jews. As in my worldview many troubles are blamed on MIC, antisemites blame Jews for global conspiracy, exploitation and mind control. At certain circumstances this hatred becomes very physical; the Jews are persecuted and anti-Jewish terrorists are funded, supplied with weapons and supported politically. This hatred is very emotional. It involves both emotional parts and mental parts of the mind. Hatred oversimplifies thinking, makes it less logical and motivates the person to fight. Hatred gives pleasure, improves self-esteem and is strongly self-reinforcing.

Sometimes the hatred becomes the core of individual's mind. Everything revolves around the hatred and it consumes the individual. Logical mind driven by hatred typically becomes very illogical. The complexity of the world is reduced to overly simplistic formulas. Collective hatred leads to wars which are damaging to humanity.

Our minds are multifunctional. Many ideas and processes can occupy our mind. I see people switching from one vibration to another and this changes their personality radically. People who are driven by political hatred can also exist in many peaceful states (statuses) as well. A person can be good with family, but when the topic of politics is activated, the same person would be filled with hatred. So we harbor multiple states of personality, which can be invoked in our mind by certain ideas and vibrations. Often hatred is habitual, brought up by culture and can be easily changed by culture. Hatred depends strongly on opinion of peers. It is often a collective emotion. Same person can be strongly hating Jews in political discussion with other antisemites and be quite tolerant and friendly to Jews in presence of Jewish peers. I am quite empathic. In discussions with antisemites I feel their emotions and am able to even accept them (with limitations). Much of the logic of political antisemites is very coherent with my logic about the MIC. I see that they make mistake expanding the definition of Jews to MIC leaders which are radically distant from Jewish values and ideas, but this can be only a question of definitions. They define MIC as Jews and in this interpretation I can see their point. Antisemites can be also often classified as alternative thinkers and much of their culture is antiestablishment culture. On other hand, antisemites are supported by MIC. Antisemitism is a secret ideology of many (but not all) MIC workers and leaders. Many atrocities have been associated with antisemitism in distant and recent human past, so my empathic alignment with antisemitism is temporary and limited. I understand antisemites when I speak with them but I choose to take a neutral enlightened humanistic position. My understanding is that both Jews and other Semites and so called antisemites (anti-Jewish people) are tricked by MIC to fight each other providing MIC with opportunity to control the prices of oil, bring instability and fear to the world, to distract the world from peaceful development, lower the vibration of the collective mind, militarize many countries and to justify compensations for many secret MIC agents around the world. So hatred is used by mainstream culture to separate people.

For me, hatred is more of a habitual nature. For example, I hate loud rap music. It is intrusive and often projects negative vibration. Some people feel good in this vibration, but I feel very dysfunctional to the extent of feeling emotional pain. So my hate for a specific music becomes an automatic reaction. When I am exposed to rap, I immediately start self-preservation activities - flee, or ask for reducing the volume or plug my years. There is an emotion involved but it is more an automatic protective reaction than emotion.

Currently, I am aware of my hatred emotions and successful in converting them to positive ones. But there was a time, when I hated another human, my close associate at work. I considered him evil and experienced an emotion of hatred towards him. When I was not thinking about him, I wasn't in a state of hatred but since I communicated with him on daily basis, the emotion was coming up often. At work meetings, my discontent about this coworker was obvious. Later, I realized the reasons for my hatred. I was under pressure for survival. It felt very real. At the time, I was new to America. I just escaped from serious troubles in Russia, where my children were underfed and our finances were extremely slim. At work I suffered from my poor knowledge of English and poor understanding of how things are done in America. Many of my skills and habits developed in Russia were not working anymore. My boss was under time pressure. He received a decent chunk of funding, and was under time pressure to produce the results. He actually used typical methods of MIC to induce separation and hatred in the lab. This allowed him a better control over people but undermined the ability of people to think and their positive motivation. Lab workers tried to bring a message across to him that more positive attitudes would greatly help the morale and we partially succeeded. It actually took an American student (who joined the lab for few months) to raise the moral in the lab and to teach all of us a more productive way of doing the work together. In many ways, our lab was a model of MIC-controlled world. There was fear, fighting for survival, competition, time pressure, opportunities, creativity, largely repressed, mainstream and alternative culture, brainwashing (during lab meetings), snitching, rewards and punishments, collective and individual delusions and deception. Nonetheless, out of many places where I worked, this was the place where I contributed most and our findings were most significant.

MIC = military-industrial complex

< PrevNext >
Max Rempel, Ph.D. | San Diego, CA | max@maxrempel.com